Medical Case Reports

Keywords

Lung cancer; Pulmonary vein; Anatomical anomaly; Common trunk

Introduction

A common presentation in the emergency departments worldwide are the upper gastrointestinal bleeding causing a great number of admissions in hospitals which in third world countries causes a huge impact in economy and becomes a big health issue. An upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is defined as bleeding proximal to the band of Treitz and clinical presentation signs depends on the intensity of the bleeding starting from vomiting of blood (hematemesis) and/or passage of black, tarry stools (melena) and in severe cases hemorrhagic shock.

The common causes of UGIB are peptic ulcer disease including from the use of aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), variceal hemorrhage, Mallory- Weiss tear and neoplasms including gastric cancer. Other relatively common causes include esophagitis, erosive gastritis/duodenitis, vascular ectasias and Dieulafoy’s lesions. Approximately 10% to 20% of bleeding episodes are from esophageal, gastric or duodenal varices or from portal hypertensive gastropathy related to portal hypertension [1,2]. In a recent study peptic ulcer disease was the most common cause of bleeding representing 40% of cases and in most studies duodenal ulcers were more common than gastric ulcers [3].

This disease causes a major number of hospitals admissions in the United States, which is estimated at 300000 patients annually. Upper GI bleeding has an annual incidence that ranges from 40-150 episodes per 100000 persons and a mortality rate of 6% to 10%. Due to the incidence of UGIB an initial management should be fast, accurate and appropriate, management should be from pharmacologic acid suppression, endoscopic hemostatic techniques and recognition of Helicobacter pylori as an etiologic agent in peptic ulcer disease [4].

One important factor in management for UGIB is the relevance of an early endoscopic diagnostic to identify the possible cause of bleeding resulting in decreasing the rate of mortality and the time of stay of admission in the hospital, international guides recommend the endoscopy study should be in the first 24 hours of admission [5,6].

Methods

A retrospective and transversal study was made in the Specialties Hospital of the social security Institute Hospital of Tegucigalpa were the medical reports of the patients that were admitted in the emergency unit under the diagnosed of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, in the period between January 1^st to December 31 in 2011.

To register the data from the medical reports a survey form was applied based on 25 closed questions about general data, comorbidities, past medical history, time from the admission to realize endoscopic exam, intrahospitalization days, findings and endoscopic procedures and condition upon discharge.

The sample obtained was of 115 patients which represented the total universe, from this all met the inclusion criteria which were the following: medical records of patients greater than 18 years old with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed that attend to the adult’s emergency unit of the social security institute hospital (IHSS) in 2011 also the endoscopic reports were reviewed for the procedure information then the data compiled was processed using Epi- INFO 2007 program (CDC).

Results

For the research 115 patients medical records were studied from these by gender 60% (69) were men and 40% were women and the most common range age was the one from 50 to 59 years old representing the 26.96% (31).

From the total number of records the 73.9% (85) have active comorbidities and the most common was arterial hypertension with a 70.77% (46) followed by cirrhosis with (55.38% (36) and third place Diabetes (Table 1).

Table 1: Co-morbidities.

Other important findings were that 101 patients present risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding such as use of aspirin with 45.88% (78) followed by Alcohol 34.71% and use of NSAIDS 18.82%. As initial symptoms, the 69.5% present hematemesis and melena with 25.2%.

Endoscopic studies were made to the 92.17% (106) from all the patients from which 10.38% represent an early endoscopic study between the first 24 hours from admission (Table 2). The most common endoscopic findings were erosive gastritis 23.50% and small esophageal varices 22.60% and gastric ulcer with 20.70% (Table 3).

Table 2: Time of endoscopy.

Table 3: Endoscopic findings.

The average time between admission and going to endoscopy was in the second and third day 74.5% and to the patients who received and early study the average time of hospitalization was of 3.1 days compared to the ones who received the study 24 hours after being 4.74 days (p=0.0001) (Table 4).

Table 4: Relation between hospitalization days and time of endoscopy.

Peptic ulcer was one important finding once the endoscopy was made between gastric and duodenal ulcers represent 26 of the cases a 24.4% and from this using the forrest classification III grade was the most frequent 77.78% (21) (Table 5), the average time of hospitalization with Forrest grade III was of 4.6 days (Table 6) and from the patients that received endoscopy i n t h e f i r s t 24 hours, the discharge was in the second day of admission with 9.5% For management 99.13% (114) were treated with proton pump inhibitors, endoscopic intervention was made to the 11.4% (12) of the patients who received an endoscopy, elastic band ligation was realized in esophageal varices in 7 patients (58.3%) and adrenaline therapy in 5 patients (41.7%). From the total only two patients had indication for Helicobacter pylori and both cases were positive. The discharge condition was positive in the 86.96% (100) and 15 patients died from which 9 (7.82%) patients didn’t received endoscopy for not being hemodynamically stable.

Table 5: Forrest classification.

Table 6: Relation between Forrest III stage and hospitalization days.

Discussion

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common presentation in the Emergency department and one frequent diagnose for admission to the hospitals which causes high economic impact in one year we recollect 115 records of medical patients that present with UGIB, the principal objective of the research was to see how endoscopy in the first 24 hours of admission helps decrease the hospitalization stay by identifying and diagnosing the cause of bleeding and initiating a proper and targeted endoscopic treatment as literature says [7].

Other aspect to discuss is the presence of risk factor in UGIB we found that from the total patients 101 had a risk factor being the most common the use of aspirin, which in the last years has become an auto medicated drug for her activity in platelet aggregation and preventing cardiovascular events, however causing a risk in gastrointestinal bleeding one studied report a 40% risk in GI bleeding with low dose aspirin [8]. Other was the use of alcohol and NSAIDS which are well known in the role of causing gastrointestinal disease.

The impact of an early endoscopy in UGIB

International Guidelines recommend early endoscopy within 24 hour of presentation, is safe and effective for all risk groups, allows timely diagnosis and treatment reduces use of resources and length of hospital stay and should be performed after hemodynamic stabilization [9]. In this research, 10.38% which represent 11 patient from the total received an endoscopy in the first 24 hours of admission and the average time of hospitalization of these patient was 3.1 days compared to the 74.5% who received the endoscopy in the second and third day who’s hospitalization stay was an average of 4.74 days unlike what international guidelines recommend that should be less than 72 hours of hospitalization, this problem could be due to the public health system that face a huge amount of patients every day and that emergency departments don’t have a gastrologist on call who can perform an endoscopy. An early endoscopy helps to diagnose and make proper management in peptic ulcers and variceal disease [10] but also can help decreasing economic cost in Honduras as each day cost an average of 4,172 lempiras.

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common endoscopic findings represented by gastritis and peptic ulcer disease, which are the most common worldwide for peptic ulcer disease. Forrest classification was used to identify patients at risk of persistent ulcer bleeding, rebleeding and mortality the FIII stage which represent a clean base ulcer was the most frequent 77.78%, that with an early endoscopy or management would decrease the number of admission resulting in less costs compared to the 4.6 days of hospitalization [11].

The most known treatment in management of UGIB since their introduction is the proton pump inhibitor is the most effective as its reduces mortality following peptic ulcer bleeding and also in preventing low dose aspirin use associated to upper gastrointestinal ulcers and bleedings but also as preventing GI disease in relation with NSAIDS use, which are a common auto medicated drug in our population being most common in elderly from the total, 114 patients were treated with proton pump inhibitor as literature says and 86.96% had an effective discharge [12-14].

Conclusion

As physicians, we should aim for an early endoscopic diagnose and targeted management in those patients who present gastrointestinal disease to prevent an acute bleeding episode which in our public health system is a concern as the huge amount of patients that transit in hospitals and we don’t count with gastrologist in after hours or in weekends. UGIB has a big rate of mortality in this research was of 13.04% rate of mortality which can be prevent by an early endoscopy made. For future research would be gastric cancer prevalence, incidence of peptic ulcer and incidence of Helicobacter pylori in high endoscopy.

References

1. Erwin B(2015) Diagnosis and therapy of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J GastrointestPharmacolTher 6: 172-182.
2. Matthew-Kim BS, Bob-LiT, Engel A, Samra JS, Clarke S, et al. (2014) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: A practical guide for clinicians. World J GastrointestPathophysiol 5: 467-478.
3. Hreinsson JP, Kalaitzakis E, Gudmundsson S, Bjornsson ES (2013) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Incidence, etiology and outcomes in a population- based setting. Scand J Gastroenterol 48: 439-447.
4. Trawick EP, Yachimski PS (2012) Management of non- variceal upper gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage: controversies and areas of uncertainty. World J Gastroenterol 18: 1159-1165.
5. Cooper GS, Chak A, Way LE (1999) Early endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: associations with recurrent bleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stay. GastrointestEndosc 49: 145-152.
6. Cooper GS, Chak A, Connors AF Jr, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE (1998) The effectiveness of early endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a community based analysis. Med Care 36: 462-474.
7. Thad W, Naiman K, Akash N, Robert RS (2012) Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am FamPhysi 85: 469-476.
8. García Rodríguez LA, Martín-Pérez M, Hennekens CH, Rothwell PM, Lanas A (2016) Bleeding risk with long term low dose aspirin: A systemic review of observational studies. Plos one 11: e0160046.
9. Holster IL, Kuipers EJ (2011) Update on the endoscopic management of peptic ulcer bleeding. CurrGastroenterol Rep 13: 525-531.
10. Banerjee S, Cash BD, Dominitz JA, Baron TH, Anderson MA, et al. (2010) The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease. GastrointestEndosc 71: 663-668.
11. Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, et al. (2015) Diagnosis and management of non- variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage : European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy guideline. Endoscopy 47: 1-46.
12. Scarpignato C,Gatta L, Zullo A, Blandizzi C (2016) SIF-AIGO-FIMMG Group: Effective and safe proton pump inhibitors therapy in acid- related disease- a position paper addressing benefits a potential harms of acid suppression. BMC Med 14: 179.
13. Mo C, Sun G, Lu ML, Zhang L, Wang YZ, et al. (2015) Proton pump inhibitors in prevention of low dose aspirin associated upper gastrointestinal injuries. World J Gastroenterol 21: 5382- 5392.
14. Leontiadis, GI, Sreedharan A, Dorward S, Barton P, Delaney B, et al. (2007) Systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost- effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Health Technol Assess 11: 1-164.